King Charles anger infuriated as he uncovers the truth about Archie’s birth story and biological parents…The lies and deceptions Meghan Markle and Prince Harry told to conceal the truth…..Prince William’s outraged and promise to make Meghan pay for her treacherous act…. Read more

King Charles anger infuriated as he uncovers the truth about Archie’s birth story and biological parents…The lies and deceptions Meghan Markle and Prince Harry told to conceal the truth…..Prince William’s outraged and promise to make Meghan pay for her treacherous act…. Read more

After the divorce row that dominated a major part of 2024, Meghan Markle now begins the new year with a surrogacy row with doubts being cast over the birth of Archie, Meghan and Harry’s firstborn. And the doubts are coming not from the Royal Family but Meghan’s estranged sister and father

This is not a new controversy as social media hate campaigns like ‘Meghan Markle was never pregnant’ surface from time to time calling her baby bump ‘moonbump’, but Radar Online reported that Buckingham Palace is “being presurred to remove Prince Archie, 5, and Princess Lilibet, 3, from the UK’s royal line of succession” until Meghan Markle provides absolute proof that she physically gave their birth.

This scandal comes as no surprise. Speculation about the children has been simmering for years. The kids are sixth and seventh in line to the throne but have been under cloak-and-dagger secrecy since they were born. There are so many questions swirling around them. This crisis won’t die down until the irrefutable truth comes out,” Radar Online quoted a highly placed palace courtier

Meghan Markle half-sister Samantha Markle recently said that if the Sussexes used a surrogate, they should have admitted it. She revealed: “My father said nine months before Archie was allegedly born that [Meghan] picked up her frozen eggs. I thought: ‘That makes sense there would be a surrogate involved.’ But why the secrecy? Instead of lying to the world, just say: ‘We’re using a surrogate

But that would mean the child would be removed from the line of succession because an heir has to be born from a titled royal mother.”